Case Studies/Evaluation

• Contains a concise and complete description of the use in well-written prose.
• Explains the novelty or importance of the use-case.
• Has complete information, including: an accompanying image with attribution information, quote, short description, and licensing metadata.
• Would be worthy of being featured elsewhere on the web.

• No edits should be necessary unless new information becomes available.

{{#if: {{#ask:Has quality::A-Class|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has quality::A-Class| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为A-Class。}}

• Contains good, complete descriptions of the use, both short and full.
• Might be missing one or two fields.
• May need small improvements writing style, grammar, spelling, etc.
• Image might be missing attribution information.
• 最新的信息可能需要更新。

• Fill in missing or incomplete metadata.
• Fix any minor issues with writing style.
• Fill in relevant updates.

{{#if: {{#ask:Has quality::B-Class|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has quality::B-Class| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为B-Class。}}

• 包含充分的使用说明。
• 一些缺少图像、引用或元数据。
• 可能漏掉了一个简短的描述。
• May contain unclear language or obviously incorrect grammar.

• Fill in missing or incomplete metadata, short description, image, quote, etc.
• Improve prose of the Case Study. The WikipediaManual of Style是一个很好的向导。

{{#if: {{#ask:Has quality::C-Class|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has quality::C-Class| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为C-Class。}}

• Has the beginnings of descriptions about the use-case.
• Substantial information missing, such as a short description, image, or metadata.
• Could contain some metadata, but is mostly incomplete.

• Begin or complete the short or full descriptions of the Case Study.
• Fill in missing or incomplete metadata.
• Find and upload an appropriate image and quote (with proper licensing and attribution information).

{{#if: {{#ask:Has quality::Start|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has quality::Start| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为Start。}}

• Has no description.
• Doesn't have more than one or two data fields.

• Begin or complete the short and full descriptions of the Case Study.
• Fill in missing or incomplete metadata.
• Find and upload an appropriate image and quote (with proper licensing and attribution information).

{{#if: {{#ask:Has quality::Stub|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has quality::Stub| ?案例研究标题=|format=template|template=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为Stub。}}

• The Case Study represents a highly successful and novel use case which illustrates the power of CC licensing.
• The site or platform using CC licensing is highly trafficked.
• The Case Study was an early adopter of CC licensing.
• The work or site under CC is of a form or produced in an industry that isn't typically associated with permissive licenses, and illustrates the compatability of Creative Commons with traditional media.
• For platforms or sites, the Case Study reports a very large volume of work or a community of users.
• Is a Case Study of a very recognizable brand.

{{#if: {{#ask:Has importance::High|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has importance::High| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为具有高重要性。}}

• 该案例研究来自一个很少有CC授权作品的地区，并且/或者是一个特定地区、文化或语言的早期采用者。
• The Case Study has developed a moderate community of users.

{{#if: {{#ask:Has importance::Medium|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has importance::Medium| ?案例研究标题=|格式=模板|模板=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|*没有案例研究被标记为具有中等重要性。}}

• 该案例研究是一个平台或艺术家使用知识共享的例子，但还没有形成一个用户社区或显著的兴趣。卡塔尔vs葡萄牙分析
• For platforms or sites, the volume of work represented by the Case Study is low.
• There are many CC use-cases or Case Studies similar to this Case Study.
• The Case Study no longer exists or has not been active in a while.

{{#if: {{#ask:Has importance::Low|searchlabel=}}|{{#ask:Has importance::Low| ?Case study title=|format=template|template=CS_Eval|limit=2|link=none|order=random|searchlabel=}}|* No Case Studies have been marked as having Low importance.}}